ANNETTE WEINER INALIENABLE POSSESSIONS PDF
Inalienable Possessionstests anthropology’s traditional assumptions about kinship, Annette B. Weiner . Afterword: The Challenge of Inalienable Possessions. : Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While Giving ( ): Annette B. Weiner: Books. In Inalienable possessions, Annette Weiner () focuses on the paradox of ‘ keeping-while-giving’ rather than the ‘norm of reciprocity’ as the.
|Published (Last):||7 October 2006|
|PDF File Size:||7.6 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.39 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Annnette of a series on. Key theories Actor—network theory Alliance theory Cross-cultural studies Cultural materialism Culture theory Diffusionism Feminism Historical particularism Boasian anthropology Functionalism Interpretive Performance studies Political economy Practice theory Structuralism Post-structuralism Systems theory.
Weiner No preview available – Other inalienable possessions, whether material objects, landed property, ancestral myths, or sacred knowledge, bestow social identity and rank as well.
Power is intimately involved in cultural reproduction, and Weiner describes the location of power in each society, showing how the degree of control over the production and distribution of cloth wealth coincides with women’s rank and the development of hierarchy in the community.
The possibilities of transmission in the face of the canon for guardianship establish for ritual leaders a domain of authority that in certain situations leads to a formalized position of rank. Goods can serve as systems of social communication according to Mary Douglasa prominent anthropologist.
The Kula trade was organized differently in the more hierarchical parts of the Trobriand islands. The Paradox of Keeping-while-giving Annette B. Users without a subscription psosessions not able to see the full content. There, only chiefs were allowed to engage in Kula exchange. In less hierarchical areas, exchange partners may lose their valuables to internal claims. About the Book Inalienable Possessions tests anthropology’s traditional assumptions about kinship, economics, power, and gender in an exciting challenge to accepted theories of reciprocity and marriage exchange.
Inalienable Possessions: The Forgotten Dimension – California Scholarship
Lists Anthropologists by nationality Anthropology by year Bibliography Journals List annefte indigenous peoples Organizations.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Acequia watercourse Ejido agrarian land Forest types Huerta Inheritance Land tenure Property law alienation easement restraint on alienation real estate title. Annette Weiner broadened the application of the category of property outside the European context with her book Inalienable Possessions: Property Property law by country.
Inalienable Possessions: The Forgotten Dimension
She currently serves as President of the American Anthropological Association. Other inalienable possessions, whether material objects, landed property, ancestral myths, or sacred knowledge, bestow social identity and rank as well.
Posssessions is not Kula shells but women’s cloth wealth that is connected with matrilineal ancestors.
Weiner begins weinre re-examining Mauss’ explanation for the return gift, the “spirit of the gift. Inalienable Possessions tests anthropology’s traditional assumptions about kinship, economics, power, and gender in an exciting challenge to accepted theories of reciprocity and marriage exchange. The more stratified a society becomes as in Hawaiithe closer the sibling bond “sibling intimacy”.
He states that these objects are “durable wealth [that] is collective property that is continually in circulation among persons who have temporary possession of it. He derived two theses from Weiner, to which he adds a third.
Economic anthropology Giving Property. These gifts are not like those given in regular gift giving in the West possessioons birthdays for example. Focusing on Oceania societies from Polynesia to Inalineable New Guinea and including Australian Aborigine groups, Annette Weiner investigates the category of possessions that must not be given or, if they are circulated, must return finally to the giver.
Focusing on Poxsessions societies from Polynesia to Papua New Guinea and including Australian Aborigine groups, Annette Weiner investigates the category of possessions that must not be given or, if they are circulated, must return finally to the giver.
The Paradox of Keeping-While Giving. In reality these pieces of “property” are annetge that a family divests itself of only with great reluctance and sometimes never. The book is also important for introducing a consideration of gender in the gift-giving debate by placing women at the heart of the political process.
Barbara Mills praised her investigation of how “inalienable possessions are simultaneously used to construct and defeat hierarchy”, saying it “opens a nanette of new theoretical and methodological tools for understanding social inequality in past and present societies. The Paradox of Keeping-While Giving. This page was last edited on 1 Augustat Books Digital Products Journals. Only gifts that are “immoveable property” can become inalienable gifts. Other editions – View all Inalienable Possessions: The Challenge of Inalienable Possessions.
Related articles Original affluent society Formalist vs substantivist debate The Great Transformation Peasant economics Culture of poverty Political economy State formation Nutritional anthropology Heritage commodification Anthropology of development. In this way, The Dreaming itself encompasses vast inalienable possessions that are authenticated by the very cosmology under which they are produced. Maintaining society thus requires not keeping-while-givingbut ” keeping-for-giving and giving-for-keeping.